Course contents

Unit 3 · Negotiation, Diplomacy & High-Stakes Talk · Review Lab

The Crisis Room

One escalating crisis, five roles, sixty minutes. You issue the diplomatic readout, run the back-channel negotiation, mediate the internal fallout, deliver the public crisis statement, and close by breaking bad news to the person who pays for it personally.

60 minDiplomatic registerNegotiationMediationCrisis communication

By the end of this Review Lab · You'll be able to:

  • · hedge diplomatically without losing the signal, then negotiate the substance behind it
  • · mediate a live dispute without disappearing into false neutrality
  • · deliver a crisis statement that owns the failure in the right order
  • · break bad news straight, hold the silence, and leave the relationship's future explicit

Vocabulary you'll use again from Unit 3

to reserve the right toa frank exchange of viewswithout prejudice toBATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement)ZOPA (zone of possible agreement)to log-rollto depersonalise (a disagreement)good-faith readingto own (the failure)duty of candourto deliver (news) straightto leave the door open
  1. 1

    Warm-up — five lines, five registers

    5 min

    Reactivate the five registers of Unit 3 (diplomatic, negotiating, mediating, crisis, bad-news) before you have to switch between them live.

    Output: One instant relabel per line: which register it belongs to and one word for what it's really doing.

    Teacher reads five short lines, one from each lesson (L11–L15). For each, in five seconds: name the register it's from and say in plain English what it's actually doing underneath the words.

    • · 'We trust further measures will not be necessary.'
    • · 'Before we trade numbers, what are you actually trying to protect?'
    • · 'We're stuck on the principle, not the number.'
    • · 'It happened on my watch.'
    • · 'I have hard news, and I want to deliver it straight.'
    From L11From L12From L13From L14From L15
  2. 2

    Stage 1 — the diplomatic readout

    8 min

    Open the crisis in diplomatic register: signal without committing, and leave room for the next stage.

    Output: A 90-second spoken readout that signals disagreement, keeps the relationship intact, and leaves at least one door open.

    The crisis: a joint venture between two companies has broken down over a missed safety inspection. You are the spokesperson for your side. Deliver a 90-second public readout. Teacher tries to translate it back into 'what really happened' — if the translation is plausible but not certain, you've calibrated correctly.

    From L11to reserve the right toa frank exchange of viewswithout prejudice tochannels (back / open / formal)

    If you're in a group: In pairs, one delivers, the other drafts the counterparty's readout in reply before hearing it.

  3. 3

    Stage 2 — the back-channel negotiation

    10 min

    Move from the diplomatic surface to the real interests, and find the trade that keeps the venture alive.

    Output: A short negotiation that surfaces at least one interest, proposes one objective criterion, and lands on one log-roll.

    Same crisis. You now sit down privately with your counterpart (teacher) to see if the venture can survive. You have 10 minutes. You must: (a) surface an interest behind your stated position, (b) propose one objective criterion for resolving the inspection dispute, (c) make one log-roll that trades across two issues, (d) know and NOT threaten with your BATNA.

    From L12BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement)ZOPA (zone of possible agreement)to anchor (high / low)to log-roll

    If you're in a group: In groups of 3, a silent observer tracks whether the BATNA is ever used as a threat and flags it.

  4. 4

    Stage 3 — mediating the internal fallout

    12 min

    The negotiation has leaked internally and two of your own team members are now in open conflict about who is to blame. Hold the middle without disappearing.

    Output: A mediated exchange that reframes at least once, summarises back at least once, and names the deadlock honestly.

    Teacher plays both team members in alternation (signalling the switch). You chair. You MUST: (a) reframe an attack as a shared question, (b) summarise back what you're hearing from each side, (c) depersonalise the disagreement at least once, (d) name the deadlock rather than paper over it, (e) end with one explicit next step both can sign onto.

    From L13to take the temperature downto surface (something) explicitlyto depersonalise (a disagreement)good-faith reading

    If you're in a group: In groups of 4, two play the team members, one mediates, one observer scores each mediator move against the L13 rubric.

  5. 5

    Stage 4 — the public crisis statement, then the hostile questions

    15 min

    The dispute has gone public. Deliver a statement that owns the failure in the right order, then survive follow-up questions without concern theatre.

    Output: A 60-second ACK/FACTS/GAP/NEXT statement, then three hostile questions answered in ≤30 seconds each.

    You are now the senior spokesperson facing the press. Deliver a 60-second statement covering ACK, FACTS, GAP and NEXT in that order. Teacher then plays a journalist with three escalating questions. You may not say 'we take this seriously'. Every answer must fit in 30 seconds.

    • · 'Who knew about the missed inspection, and when?'
    • · 'Why should anyone trust your account given today's earlier statement?'
    • · 'What happens to the people affected if the venture collapses entirely?'
    From L14to own (the failure)(it / this) happened on (our) watchroot causeduty of candour

    If you're in a group: In groups of 3, a second journalist asks harder follow-ups while an observer scores the four moves separately.

  6. 6

    Stage 5 — the bad news, delivered straight

    10 min

    Close the crisis at the human scale: tell the one person who personally loses out, honestly and with the future made explicit.

    Output: A 90-second delivery that names the news first, holds a genuine silence, and leaves the relationship's future explicit.

    The venture is being wound down and one long-standing contractor's role ends with it. Teacher plays the contractor. You have 90 seconds: name the news in the first sentence, hold a silence of at least four seconds without filling it, give the honest why, and make explicit what you'll do next for them. No compliment sandwich.

    From L15to deliver (news) straightto spare (someone) the pretenceto err on the side of (X)to leave the door open

Reflection

  • · Which of the five registers did you switch into most naturally, and which one still feels like a costume?
  • · Where in the sixty minutes did honesty and diplomacy pull in opposite directions — and which one won?
  • · If this crisis were real and yours, which of the five stages would you rehearse again before Monday?

Homework

Before Unit 4 / Lesson 16: find a real multi-stage crisis from the news (a company, a government, an institution) that moved from private negotiation to public statement to personal fallout. Map it onto the five stages of today's lab and note where the real people involved handled a stage better or worse than you did.