Unit 3 · Negotiation, Diplomacy & High-Stakes Talk · Lesson 15
Honesty, dignity and the future relationship
By the end of this lesson
You'll be able to:
Stage 1
Here's what you'll do
Three openers for the same bad news. Which one is most honest AND most humane?
You produce
You rank and defend.
Group extension (optional)
Pairs argue; group picks the line that respects the listener most.
Stage 2
Here's what you'll do
Four moves of controlled disclosure.
You produce
You label each move and its risk.
Delivering bad news at C2
Look at the four moves. Each one is doing something a softer opener can't. What is each protecting?
Name it: 'I have hard news. We are not going forward with your candidacy.'
Hold silence: '...' (deliberate pause; do not soften)
Why honestly: 'The decision came down to a single factor — depth of operating experience in this specific sector — which we weighted heavily.'
Relationship: 'I will write you a candid reference if it would help, and I'd like to stay in touch over the next year.'
The rule you'll arrive at
Bad-news delivery at C2: (a) NAME IT in the first sentence ('I have hard news. We are not going forward with your candidacy.'), (b) HOLD THE SILENCE — do not rush to fill it, (c) GIVE THE WHY honestly without using 'unfortunately' to dilute, (d) MAKE THE RELATIONSHIP EXPLICIT — what continues, what changes, what you commit to next.
Try three
1. Open: telling a friend you can't host them this weekend after promising.
'I have to break a promise. I can't host you this weekend, and I'm sorry — let me tell you what happened and what I can do instead.'
2. Honest why for declining to publish a colleague's piece.
'The piece isn't where we need it on the central argument; I don't think more edits will get it there. That's a judgment call, and it's mine to make.'
3. Explicit relationship close after firing a long-term contractor.
'Our work together ends on the 30th. I'd like to recommend you for the project at X; I'll make the introduction this week if you'd like.'
Stage 3
Here's what you'll do
Six items for difficult conversations held well.
You produce
You match each to a conversation you've had — or avoided.
to deliver (news) straight
to state it without softening into deception
"I'd rather deliver this straight than leave you guessing."
to spare (someone) the pretence
to refuse the softening that wastes the listener's time
"Let me spare you the pretence — the decision was clear."
(to deliver / give) the news on the record
to formally state, not informally hint
"I'm giving you the news on the record before you hear it elsewhere."
to err on the side of (X)
to default toward one principle when in doubt
"We err on the side of telling people directly."
to ride out (a difficult silence)
to allow it to do its work without rushing to fill it
"Ride out the silence — they need it more than you do."
to leave the door open
to preserve future possibility deliberately
"I'm leaving the door open for the next round — and I mean it."
Guided practice
1. Fill: 'Let me ____ you ____ ____.' (2 + 2 words)
spare … the pretence
2. Fill: 'We ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ telling people directly.' (6 words)
err on the side of
3. Fill: 'I'm ____ ____ ____ ____ for the next round.' (4 words)
leaving the door open
Stage 4
Here's what you'll do
Bad news delivery: 90 seconds, four moves, one silence you must not fill.
You produce
You deliver; teacher plays the listener and times the silence.
Pick a scenario. You have 90 seconds to deliver bad news to your teacher (in role). You MUST: (a) name it in the first sentence, (b) hold a deliberate silence of at least 4 seconds after naming, (c) give an honest why, (d) make the future explicit. Teacher will time the silence. If you fill it under 4 seconds, you re-do.
Use these
Prompts
Group extension (optional)
In trios, listener gives a 30-second response; mediator/observer rates the four moves.
Stage 5
Here's what you'll do
A 220-word memo from a CEO declining to renew a senior leader's contract.
You produce
Five close-reading calls.
Reading — Internal memo — 'On the executive transition'
Colleagues — I want to give you the news on the record, before it reaches you any other way. We are not extending Jordan's contract beyond the end of the financial year. The decision is mine. It is not about performance in the narrow sense; it is about the kind of leadership the next chapter of the company needs, and the honest judgement that another shape of leader is the better fit for that. Jordan has been told today, in person, and we have spoken at length. I want to be clear about what this is and what it isn't. It is a leadership decision. It is not a reflection on the team Jordan built, which is one of the strongest in the firm and remains so. Jordan will stay through a structured handover and will help shape the search. I have offered, and meant, a candid reference for whatever Jordan does next. We owe Jordan honesty in how this is communicated externally; we owe ourselves honesty about why the decision was made. We can hold both.
Comprehension
1. Where is the news NAMED?
Sentence 2 — flat statement of the decision.
2. Where does the writer give the WHY honestly?
Sentence 4 — 'the kind of leadership the next chapter of the company needs'.
3. Where does the writer PROTECT the person and the team separately?
'It is a leadership decision. It is not a reflection on the team Jordan built…'
4. Where is the RELATIONSHIP made explicit?
Structured handover; candid reference; help shape the search.
5. What is the writer refusing to do?
Hide behind performance language; soften the why; pretend the team should also turn over.
Stage 6
Here's what you'll do
Find the temptations the writer refused.
You produce
A list of three softenings the writer rejected, with reasons.
List three softenings a weaker version of this memo would have used (e.g. 'we have decided to part ways', 'after careful consideration', 'wish them every success'). For each, write one sentence on what the softening would have cost.
Group extension (optional)
Pairs swap softening lists; group ranks the most damaging weakening.
Stage 7
Here's what you'll do
Difficult one-to-one: 8 minutes, real bad news, no compliment sandwich.
You produce
A live 8-minute conversation that ends with explicit next steps.
You are a senior leader. Teacher plays a long-tenured direct report. You must end their role on the team (re-assignment, not firing). You have 8 minutes to (1) deliver straight, (2) hold the why, (3) handle their reaction without retreating, (4) end on explicit next steps. No compliment sandwich, no concern theatre.
Three minutes prep on what you'll name in the first sentence, what your honest why is, and what you can credibly offer next.
Use these
Deliverable
A one-paragraph follow-up email written immediately after, naming next steps + a 30-second debrief on the silence.
Group extension (optional)
In groups of 3, observer rates first-sentence directness and post-silence recovery.
Stage 8
Here's what you'll do
C2 Proficiency Writing Part 2 — letter that delivers difficult information.
You produce
A 60–80-word opening + closing of a difficult letter.
C2 Proficiency — Writing Part 2 (letter, 280–320 words)
Task: Letters delivering refusal, complaint or condolence reward candidates who name the difficult thing in the first paragraph rather than burying it.
Strategy: Open by naming the news; spend the middle giving the honest why; close on what continues.
Mini-task
Prompt: write the opening + closing paragraphs of a letter declining to nominate a colleague for an award you yourself proposed. Read both aloud.
Stage 9
Here's what you'll do
170 words. Bad news, delivered well.
You produce
A 170–190-word bad-news letter or memo handed in.
Write a 170–190-word letter or internal memo delivering bad news to a specific person or audience. You MUST: (a) name the news in the first two sentences, (b) give the honest why without 'unfortunately', (c) make the relationship's future explicit, (d) use at least three target items, (e) include zero compliment-sandwich filler.
Word count: 170–190 words
Must use
Stage 10
Here's what you'll do
End of L15 and end of Unit 3. Two questions, one prep.
You produce
Spoken 30-second reflection + prep for Review Lab 3.
Reflection
Homework
For Review Lab 3: prepare to act in a multi-party crisis simulation. Bring (a) a 60-second crisis statement, (b) one diplomatic backchannel script, (c) one mediator script, and (d) one bad-news script — each ≤120 words.