Unit 3 · Negotiation, Diplomacy & High-Stakes Talk · Lesson 14
Speaking when stakes are high
By the end of this lesson
You'll be able to:
Stage 1
Here's what you'll do
Same crisis. Three opening lines. Which one would you actually trust?
You produce
You rank and defend.
Your notes
Group extension (optional)
Pairs argue; group identifies which line would survive a hostile front page.
Stage 2
Here's what you'll do
Four moves of a survivable crisis statement.
You produce
You name and order each move.
Crisis register: ACK / FACTS / GAP / NEXT
Notice that a strong crisis statement always does the same four things in the same order. Identify them in the examples.
Examples
Quick rule
ACK (acknowledge specifically what happened and who was harmed) → FACTS (state what is known, time-stamped and precise) → GAP (state what is NOT yet known without using the gap to hide) → NEXT (state the next concrete action and when the next update will come). Skipping any of the four reads as evasion.
Try three
1. ACK a data leak affecting 12,000 customers.
'On 14 March we discovered that the names and email addresses of approximately 12,000 customers were exposed via a misconfigured database. We are sorry, and we want to tell you what happened.'
2. GAP a recall where the cause is uncertain.
'We do not yet know whether the fault originates with the supplier or with our own assembly process. Both reviews are under way and will be published in full.'
3. NEXT after a product safety incident.
'Owners of affected models will receive a free recall notice within 48 hours. We will publish a weekly progress note until every unit is corrected.'
Stage 3
Here's what you'll do
Six items for high-stakes public speaking.
You produce
You match each to a real crisis you've watched.
to publicly accept responsibility without diluting
"We own the failure. The fault was ours and the response is ours."
to accept responsibility by virtue of role
"It happened on my watch and I will not pass it down the chain."
to commit cautiously and exceed
"In a crisis, underpromise and overdeliver — never the reverse."
the underlying source of a failure
"We won't speculate on root cause until the review is in."
the obligation to disclose fully and honestly
"Our duty of candour means we publish what we find, including what we got wrong."
to mark the end of an event publicly
"We won't try to draw a line under this until those affected feel it has been addressed."
Guided practice
1. Fill: 'It happened on ____ ____.' (2 words)
my watch
2. Fill: 'Our ____ ____ ____ requires full disclosure.' (3 words)
duty of candour
3. Fill: 'In a crisis, ____ ____ ____ — not the reverse.' (3 words)
underpromise and overdeliver
Stage 4
Here's what you'll do
Live press statement: 60 seconds, four moves, no theatre.
You produce
You deliver; teacher times each move and flags any missing one.
Pick a scenario. You have 60 seconds to deliver a crisis statement that includes ACK, FACTS, GAP and NEXT in that order. Teacher times each move (aim ~15 seconds each) and immediately flags any concern theatre. Re-deliver if any of the four moves is missing.
Use these
Prompts
Your speaking notes
Group extension (optional)
In pairs, peer rates each of the four moves separately on a 1–3 scale.
Stage 5
Here's what you'll do
An 230-word CEO statement after an outage. Mark the architecture.
You produce
Five close-reading calls.
Instructions
You will hear a hospital trust CEO making a public statement following a medication error. For questions 1–6, complete the sentences with a word or short phrase.
1The CEO opens by acknowledging that the error happened on the trust's _____.
watch
2The statement confirms that _____ patients were affected by the incident.
a number / specific figure (listen for the exact count)
3The CEO admits the trust does not yet know the _____ of the prescribing breakdown.
root cause
4An independent review will be led by a former _____.
Chief Medical Officer
5Families will be contacted directly by the _____ team.
patient safety
6The next public update is promised within _____ hours.
48 hours
CEO statement — 'On yesterday's outage'
Tap play to listen. Replay as many times as you need.
Yesterday at 14:09, our payments system failed for approximately two hours. During that window, roughly 70,000 transactions could not complete. I want to be the first to apologise to every customer and merchant affected. The fault was on our side. It happened on my watch. We have so far established that the outage originated in a misapplied configuration change rolled out at 14:07. We have NOT yet established the full chain of decisions that allowed that change to reach production without the safeguards we believed were in place. An external review will examine that question, and its findings will be published in full, including any criticism of the leadership team. In the meantime, we are extending direct contact to every affected customer within 48 hours; reversing any incurred fees; and pausing all non-essential deployments until our review of the safeguards is complete. I will provide a further update by close of business on Friday. We do not yet deserve to draw a line under this. We will when those affected agree we have.
Stage 6
Here's what you'll do
Find the temptations the writer resisted.
You produce
A short note listing three things a weaker writer would have done.
List three lines a weaker crisis statement would have included that this one doesn‘t (e.g. ’we take this seriously', ‘this is unacceptable’, vague review promises). Discuss why each weakens the statement.
Your analysis
Group extension (optional)
Pairs draft a 'corrupted' version of the statement; group rates which is most damaging.
Stage 7
Here's what you'll do
Hostile press conference: 8 minutes, 4 questions, calibrated answers.
You produce
Each answer ≤30 seconds, structured ACK/FACTS/GAP/NEXT or a defensible subset.
You = CEO. Teacher = journalist. Crisis: factory accident, two serious injuries, cause not yet known. Teacher asks four escalating questions. You answer each in ≤30 seconds, including (where appropriate) all four moves. You may NOT say ‘we take this seriously’. Wrap with a 60-second statement.
Timing
Three minutes prep on what you know, what you don't, and what you can promise.
Use these
Deliverable
A recording or transcript + a journalist's one-line verdict on credibility.
Your deliverable / notes
Group extension (optional)
In groups of 3, second journalist asks harder follow-ups; observer scores each answer on the four moves.
Stage 8
Here's what you'll do
C2 Proficiency Listening Part 2 — sentence completion under formal register.
You produce
One ACK + one GAP sentence drafted live.
C2 Proficiency — Listening Part 2 (sentence completion from formal talks)
Task
Crisis-register sources are common in C2 listening; candidates miss key words because they expect ordinary speech.
Strategy
Listen for ACK / FACTS / GAP / NEXT as anchor points; the testable words live inside them.
Mini-task
Imagine a hospital trust statement after a medication error. Draft and read aloud ONE ACK sentence and ONE GAP sentence.
Distractor warnings
Examiner comment
"Use ACK / FACTS / GAP / NEXT as listening anchors. Testable words almost always sit at the end of a clause inside one of these four moves."
Your mini-task answer
Stage 9
Here's what you'll do
160 words. A statement that survives a hostile front page.
You produce
A 160–180-word crisis statement handed in.
Write a 160–180-word CEO statement after a (real or invented) incident. You MUST:
Word count: 160–180 words
Must use
Your writing (autosaved draft)
Stage 10
Here's what you'll do
End of L14. Two questions, one prep.
You produce
Spoken 30-second reflection.
Reflection
Homework
Find a real crisis statement from the past month. Score it ACK/FACTS/GAP/NEXT on a 0–3 scale. Bring to Lesson 15.
Your reflection
How confident do you feel with this?
Homework response
Need more practice with this language?
Extra Practice