More practice with the language you're learning
Supplementary support — grammar, vocabulary, speaking and review — built from language already taught in the course. Not a lesson, and never a test.
1.Transformation: express the same meaning without repeating the original wording — "**Open on a scene**: 'The camera enters the kitchen twelve minutes in.' (Not: 'This film is a slow, patient study of…')"
2.Transformation: express the same meaning without repeating the original wording — "**Weave the argument**: 'The camera waits the way a table waits — not the way a person does.' (An argument about the film's ethics of attention, delivered inside an image.)"
3.Transformation: express the same meaning without repeating the original wording — "**Trust the music**: 'It waits. It waits the way a table waits — not the way a person does — and by the time it looks up…' The three 'waits' do the work of a paragraph of analysis."
4.Rewrite as a scene opener: 'The novel is a subtle exploration of grief and small-town memory.'
Show answer
'On page four, someone knocks on the door of a house that has been empty for eight months, and inside the house someone hears them, and does not answer.'
5.Weave the argument: write one sentence that both DESCRIBES the pace of a slow film AND CLAIMS something about what that pace is for.
Show answer
'The film's forty-minute kitchen is not a test of your patience; it is a rehearsal of the patience the marriage will need in the last twenty.'
6.Mini-context: someone disagrees with you in a meeting. Reply in two turns, using this structure at least once.
Show answer
Four moves at C2: (a) OPEN ON A SCENE — a specific concrete moment inside the work, rendered as scene, not as summary; the verdict comes later; (b) WEAVE THE ARGUMENT — thread your claim through the scene rather than pausing the scene to argue; the reader should feel the case being made without the case interrupting; (c) TRUST THE MUSIC — write to the rhythm and sound of your sentences on purpose; a long-form review that is only reasoned is only half done; (d) LAND THE JUDGEMENT — the verdict arrives, usually near but not at the end, in the voice the piece has already established; if you have done (a), (b) and (c), you do not have to announce it.
1.Sort these into "positive", "neutral" and "critical" in tone, and be ready to defend a borderline case: to open on a scene, to weave the argument, to trust the music, to land the judgement, the reviewer's cheap moral, to smell the work, to earn the verdict, a rhythm sentence, the description-only failure, the argument-only failure
Show answer
to open on a scene — to begin a review inside a specific concrete moment of the work, not on the writer's opinion | to weave the argument — to thread a critical claim through description rather than pausing to argue | to trust the music — to let the rhythm and sound of the sentences carry weight the argument doesn't need to spell out | to land the judgement — to let the verdict arrive in the voice the piece has established, not as an announced conclusion | the reviewer's cheap moral — the failure move of turning a work into a lesson smaller than what it actually did | to smell the work — the reader's experience of a review giving them the actual texture of the thing being reviewed, not only an argument about it | to earn the verdict — to build the case in scene, description and music so the judgement arrives inevitable rather than asserted | a rhythm sentence — a sentence whose primary work is done by its sound — length, stress, repetition — not by its propositional content | the description-only failure — the review that renders the work beautifully but never dares a judgement | the argument-only failure — the review that argues intelligently and never gives the reader a scene
2.Odd one out: which of these is least like "to open on a scene" in meaning or use — to weave the argument / to trust the music / to land the judgement? Explain why.
Show answer
Compare against: to begin a review inside a specific concrete moment of the work, not on the writer's opinion
3.Odd one out: which of these is least like "to weave the argument" in meaning or use — to trust the music / to land the judgement / the reviewer's cheap moral? Explain why.
Show answer
Compare against: to thread a critical claim through description rather than pausing to argue
4.Odd one out: which of these is least like "to trust the music" in meaning or use — to land the judgement / the reviewer's cheap moral / to smell the work? Explain why.
Show answer
Compare against: to let the rhythm and sound of the sentences carry weight the argument doesn't need to spell out
5.Odd one out: which of these is least like "to land the judgement" in meaning or use — the reviewer's cheap moral / to smell the work / to earn the verdict? Explain why.
Show answer
Compare against: to let the verdict arrive in the voice the piece has established, not as an announced conclusion
6.Semantic map: place "to open on a scene" on a scale from mild to strong against two other words you know. Then use the strongest one.
7.Semantic map: place "to weave the argument" on a scale from mild to strong against two other words you know. Then use the strongest one.
8.Semantic map: place "to trust the music" on a scale from mild to strong against two other words you know. Then use the strongest one.
9.Mini-dialogue: write four lines in which two of this lesson's words appear naturally.
1.Word family: give the noun, verb, adjective and adverb forms linked to "to open on a scene" where they exist, then use the form that is hardest for you.
2.Word family: give the noun, verb, adjective and adverb forms linked to "to weave the argument" where they exist, then use the form that is hardest for you.
3.Word family: give the noun, verb, adjective and adverb forms linked to "to trust the music" where they exist, then use the form that is hardest for you.
4.Word family: give the noun, verb, adjective and adverb forms linked to "to land the judgement" where they exist, then use the form that is hardest for you.
5.Spot the mismatch: which partner does NOT work with "to open on a scene" — and what would a proficient speaker say instead?
Show answer
Natural model: Open on a scene. The verdict can wait until you've earned it.
6.Spot the mismatch: which partner does NOT work with "to weave the argument" — and what would a proficient speaker say instead?
Show answer
Natural model: Weave the argument. The reader should feel the case being made without the case interrupting.
7.Spot the mismatch: which partner does NOT work with "to trust the music" — and what would a proficient speaker say instead?
Show answer
Natural model: Trust the music. Some things you write by ear.
8.Rewrite one sentence from your last piece of writing, swapping a weak combination for a precise one from this lesson.
1.Shift the register twice: make this markedly formal, then markedly conversational — "**Open on a scene**: 'The camera enters the kitchen twelve minutes in.' (Not: 'This film is a slow, patient study of…')"
2.Shift the register twice: make this markedly formal, then markedly conversational — "**Weave the argument**: 'The camera waits the way a table waits — not the way a person does.' (An argument about the film's ethics of attention, delivered inside an image.)"
3.Shift the register twice: make this markedly formal, then markedly conversational — "**Trust the music**: 'It waits. It waits the way a table waits — not the way a person does — and by the time it looks up…' The three 'waits' do the work of a paragraph of analysis."
4.Diplomatic vs direct: soften this, then sharpen it. Which version would you actually use, and to whom? "Which single sentence in the review would you cut if you had to lose one — and does the case for the verdict survive?"
5.Compress: express the idea behind "Open on a scene. The verdict can wait until you've earned it." in six words or fewer without losing the nuance.
Show answer
to begin a review inside a specific concrete moment of the work, not on the writer's opinion
6.Compress: express the idea behind "Weave the argument. The reader should feel the case being made without the case interrupting." in six words or fewer without losing the nuance.
Show answer
to thread a critical claim through description rather than pausing to argue
7.Compress: express the idea behind "Trust the music. Some things you write by ear." in six words or fewer without losing the nuance.
Show answer
to let the rhythm and sound of the sentences carry weight the argument doesn't need to spell out
8.Read one of your own paraphrases aloud. Which word choice is doing the most work? Replace everything around it.
1.Rank and justify: order the ideas in Which single sentence in the review would you cut if you had to lose one — and does the case for the verdict survive? / Where would you locate the review's turning point — the sentence after which the verdict becomes inevitable? / Where does the writer risk sounding pleased with themselves — and how do they pull back before the sentence dies? from most to least convincing. Defend your top choice.
2.Role-play: 3 minutes fix the four framing lines; 19 minutes draft; 5 minutes read aloud; 3 minutes live edit. Take the position you least agree with.
3.Decision task: you have two minutes to reach a single recommendation on The 500-word review, on one page, with the four framing lines at the top and every editor-marked line noted.. State it in one sentence.
4.Now switch sides and argue the opposite for 60 seconds. Which language had to change?
5.Follow-up — push further: The work you brought (from L43 homework). Add a counter-example.
6.Follow-up — push further: Back-up: a book you have re-read at least twice. Add a counter-example.
1.Paragraph ordering: draft your four topic sentences only, then decide their best order and say why.
2.Partial writing: write only the concession paragraph of Write a 500-word long-form review in the register of 'Kitchen Time'. At the top of the page, fix your four moves in one sentence each: OPENING SCENE, WOVEN ARGUMENT, MUSIC, LANDING. The review MUST: open on a specific scene inside the work, weave the argument through description, use at least ONE rhythm sentence whose primary work is sound, land the judgement without 'in conclusion' and without a cheap moral. Alongside, submit a 40-word POSTSCRIPT — 'The four moves, defended' — one line per move. Use at least SEVEN target items naturally. — 60–80 words.
3.Editing pass: cut 15% of your words without losing content. What went first?
4.Audience switch: rewrite your opening for a hostile reader, then for a sympathetic one.
5.Self-check: underline every repeated word and replace two with precise choices from this lesson.
1.Take one Part 2-style review prompt ('Write a review of a recent film or book for an international magazine'). Deliver a 60-second pitch that fixes your four moves aloud AND delivers the first two sentences of the drafted opening.
Show answer
For any Part 2 review prompt, refuse the temptation to open with your rating. Open on a scene inside the work — one specific concrete moment. Weave your judgement through the second and third paragraphs. Land the verdict in the last third, in the voice the review has been speaking in — never with 'in conclusion' and never with a cheap moral about what the work 'reminds us of'.
2.Find the evidence: which exact words in the text/script support this — Where does the review OPEN ON A SCENE — and why does the choice of THAT scene matter?
Show answer
'The camera enters the kitchen twelve minutes in, and it does not leave the kitchen again for forty.' It opens on the film's most demanding stylistic choice — the choice a lazy review would summarise as 'slow'. Opening on the scene makes the review's later argument about kitchen-competence and marriage inevitable rather than asserted.
3.Find the evidence: which exact words in the text/script support this — Where does the review WEAVE ARGUMENT INTO DESCRIPTION?
Show answer
Paragraph 2 in full. 'The forty minutes in the kitchen are the film's argument.' The claim about long marriage — that the small competences are what will be missing — is delivered as the description of the tea towel, the radio, the plate. The argument never pauses the scene.
4.Find the evidence: which exact words in the text/script support this — Where does the review TRUST THE MUSIC — pick one sentence whose primary work is sound, not fact.
Show answer
'A patient person is still, on the inside, waiting for something. A patient table has stopped waiting; it is simply the thing that is there when whatever is going to happen, happens.' The parallelism ('a patient person… a patient table') is a rhythm sentence — the meaning is carried by the shape, not by an added fact.
5.Key word transformation: rewrite "**Open on a scene**: 'The camera enters the kitchen twelve minutes in.' (Not: 'This film is a slow, patient study of…')" using the structure from Long-form criticism: open on a scene · weave argument · trust the music · land the judgement, don't announce it, in 3–8 words.
Show answer
Four moves at C2: (a) OPEN ON A SCENE — a specific concrete moment inside the work, rendered as scene, not as summary; the verdict comes later; (b) WEAVE THE ARGUMENT — thread your claim through the scene rather than pausing the scene to argue; the reader should feel the case being made without the case interrupting; (c) TRUST THE MUSIC — write to the rhythm and sound of your sentences on purpose; a long-form review that is only reasoned is only half done; (d) LAND THE JUDGEMENT — the verdict arrives, usually near but not at the end, in the voice the piece has already established; if you have done (a), (b) and (c), you do not have to announce it.
6.Reflection: which part of this task type costs you most time, and what will you do differently next time?
1.True, false or not stated? Decide for each, then correct the false ones: "'The camera enters the kitchen twelve minutes in, and it does not leave the kitchen again for forty.' It opens on the film's most demanding stylistic choice — the choice a lazy review would summarise as 'slow'. Opening on the scene makes the review's later argument about kitchen-competence and marriage inevitable rather than asserted." · "Paragraph 2 in full. 'The forty minutes in the kitchen are the film's argument.' The claim about long marriage — that the small competences are what will be missing — is delivered as the description of the tea towel, the radio, the plate. The argument never pauses the scene." · "'A patient person is still, on the inside, waiting for something. A patient table has stopped waiting; it is simply the thing that is there when whatever is going to happen, happens.' The parallelism ('a patient person… a patient table') is a rhythm sentence — the meaning is carried by the shape, not by an added fact."
Show answer
Where does the review OPEN ON A SCENE — and why does the choice of THAT scene matter? → 'The camera enters the kitchen twelve minutes in, and it does not leave the kitchen again for forty.' It opens on the film's most demanding stylistic choice — the choice a lazy review would summarise as 'slow'. Opening on the scene makes the review's later argument about kitchen-competence and marriage inevitable rather than asserted. | Where does the review WEAVE ARGUMENT INTO DESCRIPTION? → Paragraph 2 in full. 'The forty minutes in the kitchen are the film's argument.' The claim about long marriage — that the small competences are what will be missing — is delivered as the description of the tea towel, the radio, the plate. The argument never pauses the scene. | Where does the review TRUST THE MUSIC — pick one sentence whose primary work is sound, not fact. → 'A patient person is still, on the inside, waiting for something. A patient table has stopped waiting; it is simply the thing that is there when whatever is going to happen, happens.' The parallelism ('a patient person… a patient table') is a rhythm sentence — the meaning is carried by the shape, not by an added fact.
2.Retrieval race: in 60 seconds, list every word from this lesson you can remember, then check what you missed.
Show answer
to open on a scene, to weave the argument, to trust the music, to land the judgement, the reviewer's cheap moral, to smell the work, to earn the verdict, a rhythm sentence, the description-only failure, the argument-only failure
3.Use "to open on a scene" in a sentence about a completely different topic from the lesson.
Show answer
to begin a review inside a specific concrete moment of the work, not on the writer's opinion
4.Use "to weave the argument" in a sentence about a completely different topic from the lesson.
Show answer
to thread a critical claim through description rather than pausing to argue
5.Use "to trust the music" in a sentence about a completely different topic from the lesson.
Show answer
to let the rhythm and sound of the sentences carry weight the argument doesn't need to spell out
6.Teach it back: explain Long-form criticism: open on a scene · weave argument · trust the music · land the judgement, don't announce it to someone who has never met it, in under 45 seconds.
Show answer
Four moves at C2: (a) OPEN ON A SCENE — a specific concrete moment inside the work, rendered as scene, not as summary; the verdict comes later; (b) WEAVE THE ARGUMENT — thread your claim through the scene rather than pausing the scene to argue; the reader should feel the case being made without the case interrupting; (c) TRUST THE MUSIC — write to the rhythm and sound of your sentences on purpose; a long-form review that is only reasoned is only half done; (d) LAND THE JUDGEMENT — the verdict arrives, usually near but not at the end, in the voice the piece has already established; if you have done (a), (b) and (c), you do not have to announce it.
7.Which of the four moves — scene, argument, music, landing — did you most trust today, and which did you have to force?